PaFOICPennsylvania Freedom of Information Coalition

Pennsylvania Freedom of Information Coalition

PNA Legal Hotline: Vote taken at unadvertised meeting not void

From the PNA Legal Hotline

By Teri Henning, General Counsel
and Melissa Melewsky, Media Law Counsel

Pennsylvania Newspaper Association

Q: A borough held an unadvertised special meeting and voted to create a contract during
the meeting. Does Sunshine Act automatically void the contract because the meeting was
not properly advertised?

A: No. The Sunshine Act does not automatically void official action taken in violation
of the act. There must first be a legal challenge (lawsuit) filed with the appropriate court,
and the court must find that a violation occurred.

Section 713 of the Sunshine Act allows a legal challenge to be filed within 30 days from
the date of a meeting which is open, or within 30 days from the discovery of any meeting
or action taken in contravention of the act provided that a legal challenge must be filed no
later then one year from the date the alleged violation occurred. If a court determines
that the meeting violated the act, it may declare any or all official action taken at the
meeting invalid.



Pennsylvania Newspaper Association attorneys provide member newspapers with advice on the state's open records and open meetings laws.

2009 News