PaFOICPennsylvania Freedom of Information Coalition

Pennsylvania Freedom of Information Coalition

PPL fights to protect anonymous tip

In court filings this week, PPL Electric Utilities Corp. argued the public does not have the right to know about an anonymous tip that came during an October 2011 snowstorm in which some Lehigh Valley residents were left waiting for power to be restored while a PPL crew was diverted to an outage that was not next in line. Read More…

Media law experts: Coal Twp. tabled 'no recording' idea is not reasonable

COAL TOWNSHIP — Media law experts agree that a now-tabled policy proposal restricting citizens from audio recording the Coal Township Board of Commissioner's public agenda sessions would not hold up under judicial review Read More…

Phila. council ignoring Sunshine laws, watchdog group says

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) — A state watchdog group says Philadelphia City Council willfully ignored Pennsylvania’s open-meetings law this past week by gathering behind closed doors — not once, but twice. Read More…

Media coalition argues that public has right to PPL storm outage documents

A coalition of Pennsylvania media and open government advocacy groups, including the Pennsyvlania Freedom of Information Coalition, filed court papers Tuesday arguing that the Public Utility Commission should release documents it relied upon last year to reach a settlement with PPL Utilities over power restoration irregularities after a freak October 2011 snowstorm. Read More…

Unlocking public information: How Pocono municipalities fare

How public is public information and how responsive are municipalities and agencies in the Poconos to requests for such material? Depending on who is responding, the answer can range from getting the information right away to replies that can drag on for weeks, a Pocono Record audit found. Read More…

Pa. measure would require recording of secret meetings

HARRISBURG — Under legislation before the House, state and local government agencies would be required to record secret meetings so that, if challenged by citizens, a court later could determine whether the body violated the state's open meetings law.
Read More…